Determinants of immunodominance for CD4 T cells

AR Kim, S Sadegh-Nasseri - Current opinion in immunology, 2015 - Elsevier
Current opinion in immunology, 2015Elsevier
Highlights•Immunodominant epitope processing and selection requires DM, MHC II, and
cathepsins.•Immunodominance is determined by epitope abundance.•Antigens from
different source might be processed differently.•Pathogen derived epitopes are captured on
intact antigens and are insensitive to DM.•Autoantigens are captured as peptides and are
insensitive to cathepsins.The term immunodominance was originally defined as a restricted
T cell response to a short peptide sequence derived from a given protein [1]. The question of …
Highlights
  • Immunodominant epitope processing and selection requires DM, MHC II, and cathepsins.
  • Immunodominance is determined by epitope abundance.
  • Antigens from different source might be processed differently.
  • Pathogen derived epitopes are captured on intact antigens and are insensitive to DM.
  • Autoantigens are captured as peptides and are insensitive to cathepsins.
The term immunodominance was originally defined as a restricted T cell response to a short peptide sequence derived from a given protein [1]. The question of what determines immunodominance has been a longstanding battle for the past two decades. Hundreds of papers have been written on different aspects of epitope selection during antigen processing documenting the complexity of the process. Antigen processing machinery involves several accessory molecules and chaperons coevolved with proteins of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules that each plays its part in epitope selection. These molecules are targeted to specialized vesicular compartments that also accommodate antigen processing enzymes called cathepsins. Within the antigen processing compartments, highly regulated pH gradient and reducing conditions and enzymes necessary for denaturation of the antigens are available and function to optimize processing of antigen and selection of the fittest for transport to the cell membrane and presentation to T cells. Despite the complexity, a cell free reductionist antigen processing system was recently reported that included only few purified proteins, but was shown to process and select physiologically relevant epitopes from full length protein antigens [2••]. Due to its minimalist nature the system has been quite helpful in dissecting the factors that contribute to epitope selection during antigen processing. In this review, we would summarize and highlight models that may explain how the dominant epitope may be selected for presentation to CD4+ helper T cells.
Elsevier